The Chronicles of Narnia: A Review

February 4th, 2011

With the gift of a new Kindle for Christmas, I have been reading a bunch of fiction for enjoyment — much in the same way I might watch throwaway television shows for the same purpose. I never read the Narnia books as a child. I do remember reading The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe, but I had little knowledge of the rest of the series until high school. And by then, there seemed little point in reading a children’s series.

Having read them now, I can’t say that my opinion has changed all that much. The books are extremely quick reads (~2,000 “locations” under the new Kindle formatting) and are suitable for a very young audience. They all exist in the fictional world of Narnia and feature the adventures of children (from our world) who get drawn into it. Here, I’d like to offer some basic impressions and thoughts.

Spoiler alert: the following contains plot details.

Much has been made over the reading order of the novels, since their internal chronology differs from the order in which they were written. However, since the narrative voice appears to follow the publishing order, I would recommend not deviating from what appear to be Lewis’s original intentions. That sets up the following order:

chroniclesnarnia.jpg
  1. The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
  2. Prince Caspian
  3. The Voyage of the Dawn Treader
  4. The Silver Chair
  5. The Horse and His Boy
  6. The Magician’s Nephew
  7. The Last Battle

The arguments stem from the fact that The Magician’s Nephew is a prequel to the rest of the series and details the creation of Narnia, and The Horse and His Boy chronicles events that took place sometime during the original rule of the four children over Narnia — a reign that is glossed over at the end of Wardrobe before the children’s return to England.

Looking back over the series, I’d have to say that the first two remain my favorite. These books introduce you to the world of Narnia and detail the original adventures of the Pevensies (the four children). The books that follow pick up different protagonists to whom I never grew very attached. The Voyage of the Dawn Treader does feature the younger Pevensies (Edmund and Lucy), but their character development is lost to the format of the novel: essentially a classic “road trip” novel featuring the adventures they run into along the way. This puts it in a line of great “road trip” tales — from Homer’s Odyssey to Twain’s Huckleberry Finn. But, of course, it cannot hold a candle to either.

The Silver Chair features Eustace (a protagonist picked up in the Dawn Treader) and a new one, Jill Pole, as they journey to the Northern reaches of Narnia in search of Caspian’s nephew. The Pevensie children are gone by this point. The novel drags in several places and never quite establishes its pacing and purpose.

The Horse and His Boy, as mentioned, leaps back in time to the reign of the Pevensies, yet the novel hardly features them at all. Instead, we get a new protagonist, Shasta, who escapes from Southern Calormen to Archenland, running into adventures along the way.

The Magician’s Newphew is somewhat interesting, in that it details the creation of Narnia and tells the story of the White Witch, the first “fall” of mankind, and the introduction of evil into the world. By now, the Christian allegory of the novels is getting rather heavy-handed, whatever Lewis’s claims may be.

lastbattle.jpg

Finally, The Last Battle features the coming of the anti-Christ and the destruction of Narnia. Unfortunately, Lewis seems to lose some of his best storytelling elements here. The description of “heaven” in the final few chapters is incredible — thinking of such joys, it is not hard to see how the promise of heaven will always remain a powerful incentive to believe in Christianity. Lewis is brave enough to feature the death of all his main protagonists (with the strange omission of Susan, who has apparently grown to “feminine” and adult-like for Narnia). Instead of ending on a bittersweet note, however, they are whisked all off to heaven and everyone lives happily ever. Except, of course, Susan. I’d love to read a story about Susan’s life after this point. She loses all of her siblings in a single train accident and they all live happily ever after without her.

My complaints about the series are really directed at children’s novels in general. There is not enough dark material here. The mythical background of Narnia is inconsistent and lacking in depth. When you read Lord of the Rings, you come away in awe of the amount of backstory that went into Middle Earth. You feel as if it is a real place with a history all of its own. In Narnia, Lewis often talks of other times and places, but does so in passing. You feel as if he’s given it about as much thought as you have.

Moreover, every problem gets resolved in the most fortunate manner, often within a paragraph or two of its introduction. The series is strongest when the White Witch is present, because she provides a serious counterpoint to the fortune of the children. In the novels where she is absent, the story suffers because of the need for a quality villain.

Ultimately, I cannot recommend the novels very highly. I think they are nice children’s novels, but offer little for the adult reader.

Share and Enjoy:

  • RSS
  • Print
  • email
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • PDF
  • StumbleUpon

Using the Kindle 3: First Month Impressions

January 27th, 2011
kindle1.jpg

This Christmas, I asked for a Kindle and my parents were kind enough to get it for me. I can remember reading about the original Kindle months before it was released. I watched its development closely and imagined a time when I could leave behind all of my philosophy books for the ease of an e-reader. The advantages were compelling: portability, text-searchable, notes, highlighting, et cetera. Essentially, it looked like we were standing on the verge of a movement potentially as big as the iPod.

But there were problems. The device was expensive, the screen lacked clarity, it was awkwardly designed, and its compatibility and offerings were terrible. I held back.

But after Amazon announced there Wifi-model for $139, I knew that the time was finally right to experiment with one. I am so glad that I did. For lack of a better phrase, I have fallen in love with my Kindle after using it for only a month. I currently have over two hundred books on my Kindle. When I travel back to Portland for breaks, I will no longer have to cart (literally) over 50 pounds of books with me. And that is “literally” in its literal sense and not the stupid hyperbole that is favored by most people these days.

kindle3.jpg

Why do I love it? Let me count the ways:

  1. It is lightweight and comfortable to use.
    One “annoying” thing about books is that you have to figure out a way to bend its spine, hold back pages, and work with the medium. This can make reading in bed, or reading one-handed, a challenge. With the Kindle, you just pick it up with either hand and you’re done.
  2. Massive Library
    Just like owning an iPod, the Kindle allows you to take a library of books with you on the go. I took it on the plane with me coming back from Portland and read from two different books — all in a package that can fit in my jacket pocket. Pretty cool.
  3. No bookmarks.
    The Kindle remembers where I left off in every book that I’m reading. No worries about losing a page ever again. No folding back the tips of pages. No shoving napkins into books.
  4. Text-searchable.
    I read the Lord of the Rings trilogy on the Kindle and this feature really leapt out at me. If I wanted to look up a character’s name or a reference to a place or event, I could do so on the fly. Normally, I would be making all sorts of marks in the margins and front-flap in order to keep my own references. No more.
  5. Non-destructive highlighting and notations.
    I’ve always felt bad about marking up my texts. Even if I’m the only one who’s ever going to read them, it affects all future reads. With the Kindle, you can highlight and mark up the pages without changing or altering the text. You can edit or delete them later if you like. And, of course, you can search them for content. Very cool
  6. Dictionary
    I’ll admit it: I’m lazy. When I stumble across a new word while reading, I rarely take the time to get up and search for the word. The internet has changed this a bit, but I’m often not around a connection while reading a book. With the Kindle, you just flick the cursor and you get an instant definition. I’ve found myself looking up all sorts of words (many of the British-isms lately) that I never would have done before. It’s very handy.
  7. It’s fast.

This last point deserves emphasizing. I have found that reading on the Kindle is incredibly fast. Perhaps it’s not having to turn pages and keep them pinned. Whatever it is, I find that I am drawn deeply into the text and am reading at an incredible rate. In the past month, this is a list of the books I have read on my Kindle:

300movie02.jpg
  • The Lord of the Rings Trilogy by J.R.R.
    Tolkien
  • The Hobbit by J.R.R. Tolkien
  • The “Dexter” Series by Jeff Lindsay
    • Darkly Dreaming Dexter
    • Dearly Devoted Dexter
    • Dexter in the Dark
    • Dexter by Design
  • The Chronicles of Narnia by C.S. Lewis
    • The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe
    • Prince Caspian: the Return to Narnia
    • The Voyage of the Dawn Treader
    • The Silver Chair

I have to read a lot for work and I don’t get the chance to read fiction very often. But I think I’ve managed to read more fiction in the past month than in the past year. Ultimately, the success of e-books will rest on whether or not book lovers are able to read on them. In my case, the answer is a resounding “yes.”

Share and Enjoy:

  • RSS
  • Print
  • email
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • PDF
  • StumbleUpon